When assessing the validity of a TINA waiver, which of the following is NOT a criterion?

When assessing the validity of a TINA (Truth in Negotiations Act) waiver, one of the key criteria considered is whether certain conditions are met that justify waiving the requirement for certified cost or pricing data. In this context, the criterion related to the contractor's history of compliance does not typically play a direct role in determining the validity of a TINA waiver. Instead, the focus lies more on the conditions surrounding the procurement process and whether the government can achieve reasonable pricing without the waiver.

The other criteria—reasonable procurement without a waiver, demonstrated benefits to the government, and reasonable price determination without pricing data—are essential in affirming that a TINA waiver is warranted. These criteria address the necessity and relevance of obtaining a waiver based on the circumstances at hand, highlighting factors such as market conditions and the nature of the procurement.

Understanding that the contractor's history of compliance does not influence the current situation is crucial, as TINA waivers predominantly revolve around the immediate context of the procurement rather than past contractor behaviors. This distinction clarifies why this particular criterion does not fit into the assessment of TINA waiver validity.